Talk:Bismarck-class corvette

Bismarck-class corvette has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Bismarck-class corvette is part of the Screw corvettes of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 28, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
October 12, 2019	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bismarck-class corvette/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taking this one on. Courcelles (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missing a word in "and 6.18 to 6.3 m (20.3 to 20.7 ft)."
- Good catch
"one pinnace," Dab link there
- Fixed
"Stein had twelve Gneisenau had fourteen" Missing comma
- Fixed - there was a time I used too many commas. I may have over-corrected ;)
"the German torpedo-boat force had increased to the size that Blücher could fill both roles" Might be wrong, but sure feels like we're missing a "no longer" in this sentence.
- Whoops!
"sinking her and killing most of her crew." Might want to be more specific about which ship sank.
- I had wondered if that was clear enough when I wrote it
"A strong storm surprised the crew, who raised, through a communication problem between the commander and engine room crew, raised anchor and tried to get the vessel underway." Two "raised"s
- Fixed
As usual, nothing but some minor issues. Courcelles (talk) 00:23, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks again, Courcelles! Parsecboy (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nicely done, promoted. Courcelles (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SMS Stein edit

I altered this sentence under SMS Stein: " all of the other Bismarck-class corvettes had at least one deployment aboard." in two ways- first, to correct spelling of "aboard" to "abroad", clearly what is intended, and second to add the word "full" before "deployment", as a clarification since the passage immediately goes on to describe a voyage to China, which is abroad, but not a full term of service away from Germany. A slightly more specific form of words seemed in order, and could be achieved with one word. Random noter (talk) 02:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me - of course I knew what I meant (I am in my own head, after all!), but I can see how that could be unclear. Parsecboy (talk) 13:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]