Talk:Birla family

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Delete. Not notable--81.77.82.202 20:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Extremely notable.--Navin gupt (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Notable. I just received the delete notice and it seems I moved this from 'Birlas' after looking that up a long way back. I am not at all in the habit of randomly looking up Indian families (being neither generally interested in Indian corporations, or politics), so I am sure it is notable. Perhaps having someone flesh out the article should be encouraged, but definitely don't delete it. prat (talk) 00:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Talk:Birla family/Comments

I would like to know why Jonathan D. Parshall has removed the para I added under the Birlas. What was the reasoning? By doing so you are not giving the true facts about Birlas; if you had to remove it there should have been a discussion with me.... Regards.

Forhiddenfacts

Revert changes by User:Forhiddenfacts

Although criticism is acceptable in an encyclopaedia article, the way it is presented here makes the article one-sided and reads as a defamation of the Birla Family. A more comprehensive article will need to be developed before criticism can be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitehat (talk • contribs)

I have added a couple of citations that are critical of Birlas. They do not minimize the impact of the Birla family on the economy of India, and I think facts are fairly represented. Malaiya (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

I have tagged the article because it currently reads just shy of a promotion piece on the family. The text needs to be presented neutrally: not a pro-con piece showing both sides of an "argument", but a neutral piece based on verifiable, factual information. —C.Fred (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are Birlas Maheshwari?

Yes, without a doubt. It is extremely well known.

Sitush had removed a mention of the fact (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Birla_family&diff=626335162&oldid=609687388).

One can easily find dozens of references, published during different times during the past 100 years, in English and Hindi, that plainly state that. It should not take more than a couple of seconds to find a few.

Incidentally I personally attended a few Marwari weddings in Pilani, Birlas' hometown. Malaiya (talk) 01:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush's addition

The editor Sitush (who had earlier objected to identifying Birlas as Maheshwari) has inserted into the text:

"The Birla family origins lie with the Maheshwari caste of Vaishya traders but they were outcaste from their traditional community in 1922 when one of their number, Rameshwar Das Birla, was thought to have broken the caste marriage rules"

This is incorrect and improper.

Rameshwar Das Birla had married his wife from a section of Maheshwaris that an orthodox section of the Maheshwaris did not accept. That caused a split in the Maheshwari community, that lasted for a few years. The Maheshwari Mahasabha eventually decided that the disputed section is proper Maheshwari. A detiled discussion can be seen on p. 75-76 of Utpattikhand of Maheshvari Jati ka Itihas (1940).

In any case, the Birla family obviously existed long before this event.Malaiya (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Birla family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The term "Marwari"

The article states:

"The Birla family belongs to the Maheshwari subcaste of the Vaishya (trader) caste, and are Marwari since they hail from the Marwad region of present-day Rajasthan."

They are **not** from the Marwad region, which is the Jodhpur region. Pilani is in the Shekhawati region, which in the opposite corner of Rajasthan. The earliest merchant settlers in Bengal did come from Marwad, and thus all the Rajasthani merchant communities came to be called Marwadi. Malaiya (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to the family tree

Can someone please add Aryaman Birla and Ananya Birla to the family tree? They are the daughter and son respectively of Kumar Mangalam Birla. I can't figure out how to edit it.

--I am not a Seahorse (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done --$ufyan (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]