This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
The photo of the work titled "Sitting on History" at the head of the infobox bears this caption: "The sculpture, with its ball and chain, refers to the book as the captor of information from which we cannot escape." No source is provided for this statement. The "meaning" of a work of art may only be known to the artist themselves, and on the other hand, its meaning may be infinitely varied as each individual experiences it. And it is anathema to many recent artists to attach an explanation for the "meaning" of their works; it's seen as reductive and didactic. If Woodrow did not make this statement himself, it should be removed. Even if it were the opinion of say, his gallerist or a prominent curator or art jouranlist, that would still not justify its inclusion here. Bricology (talk) 01:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
