Talk:Bill Clinton judicial appointment controversies

United States courts and judges Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Exanding

I think instead of just listing the people here and then making an article for all of them. Try taking info from those sepperate articles and putting it together here.Gears Of War 13:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Focus on nominees rather seats

For failed appellate nominees, the article refers to, for example, J. Rich Leonard being nominated to a North Carolina seat on the 4th circuit or James E. Duffy, Jr. being nominated to a Hawaii seat on the 9th circuit. These designations are by tradition only, and "ownership" can and does change. In the previous examples, the Leonard seat is now occupied by Virginian Roger Gregory and the Duffy seat used to be a held by Cynthia Holcomb Hall of California. Also, judges sometimes move after being appointed, which can further confuse the matter (e.g. Stephen Trott moving from California to Idaho, Barrington Daniels Parker, Jr. moving from Connecticut to New York). So, rather than describing contested nominations using a somewhat artificial state-based approach, I think it makes more sense to focus on the nominees themselves. Thoughts? Billyboy01 (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

This article seems to focus on judicial appointments that failed rather than controversies per se, especially because one of the entries is described as not being a controversy but nonetheless a failure. I don't see a focus on anybody who was controversial but who nonetheless failed. What could we rename this to? Maybe Failed judicial appointments by Bill Clinton? Kansan (talk) 15:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Judge Judith D. McConnell

Judge McConnell finally got appointed to an appellate court by state Governor Gray Davis before he was ousted by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Now she's on the California Commission on Judicial Performance. McConnell had more than one controversial ruling while she sat on the San Diego Superior Court bench; her term expires next year, perhaps she will be replaced. I don't think this article is solely about random Clinton rejects, it's also about judges who should not have been elevated to higher positions of authority. They were already out of their league. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.158.155 (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Clinton judicial appointment controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051114151130/http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/05/06/clinton.judge/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/05/06/clinton.judge/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]