Jump to content

Talk:Biljana Srbljanović/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Karadžić

Did't she deny that she is related to Radovan Karadžić? --BokicaK 20:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

No. Nikola 11:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
But those links are weak evidence. And further http://blog.b92.net/arhiva/node/4543 --[[User:BokicaK|Bojan]] 17:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
She didn deny it there either. Nikola 08:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

No, she said that it is attempt at discreditation. We should add that she didn't explicitly deny Slobodna Dalmacija question. -- Bojan  05:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC) She didn't deny it, but also not confirmed. So, it is irrelevant.

Quote reference

The reference put on the quote is wrong. The text is about BS as member of LDP, and there is no such quote in the whole text. Yo'd better find the text where she said this, or remove it.--Maduixa 07:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

References to quotes from questionable sources are against one of Wikipedia's core content policies.WP:V

E deco,tako se to radi

--'''Marko Radovanovic''' 20:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


This article is not neutral,but is biased against Srbljanovic.It contains opinions of the person who wrote it, which are superficial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.66.187.154 (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Bias Issues

It is biased against Biljana. "Controversies" section isn't supposed to be longer then "Biography" section when we're talking about someone as successful as she is. Serbian version is done in way higher quality. (UNSIGNED)

WHAT?! The controversies section can be as long as it wants to be. That unsigned comment up top can think as much as it wants about successes and so forth, but when someone is controversial, despite their apparent successes (just as an aside, I never heard of her until she insulted Milan Gurovic), their controversies must be mentioned. In short, if her controversies are many, then they should be included. Not including them due to some delusional 'length of article' considerations is, well, delusional. This is a wiki article, it is not a a newspaper article where we have space issues, nor is it her personal campaign page. Accuracy, people! Ganseki (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Quotes are giving undue weight to a viewpoint and therefore are not neutral. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. WP:UNDUE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.101.235.201 (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced information that may damage the reputation of living persons or organizations in articles and do not move it to the talk page (See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for details of this policy). As Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has put it:

I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.

–Jimmy Wales [1]

Obviously, somebody doesn't like what she's saying about Serbian society ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.131.64 (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree that this page is very biased against Biljana, so I would like to add the tag that at the start of the "controversies" section. Saigon from europe (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


I removed this part: "On the other hand, many others believe that her political activism is a form of self-promotion" This is very biased and only represents the user's POV - or someone else's, I wouldn't know, since there is no citation provided. It is also completely unnecessary and pointless: you could go and write the same thing at the page of any public figure who is outspoken about political and social issues. Nightandday (talk) 21:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I think that all that Controversies thing shoudl be deleted or written more profesionaly because the accusations from the article from vreme are put out of context and presented as general. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.241.66 (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

Place of birth

In a private email conversation she told me that she was not born in Stockholm (she didn't tell me where she was born; just that this fact is not true). As there are no references for her birth place, I removed it. So, only the fact that she was born in Sweden stays now. --millosh (talk (meta:)) 08:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Leya Keller?

Why does she call herself "Leya Keller" on the internet? I know she is or was married to that french guy Keller. But where comes "Leya" from?--87.184.168.253 (talk) 12:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biljana Srbljanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Biljana Srbljanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Biljana Srbljanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Biljana Srbljanović/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Very bad article, with lot of half truths and intentional misinterpretation.

It seems that in the biography of the best and the most widely played living Serbian play writer the most important fact is that she lost in court against Emir Kusturica, in some trivial case, in the time when Serbian courts were still dominated judges elected by Slobodan Milosevic. For a long time I can't remember I have read such a biased article.

Obviously written or revised by someone who has something personal against Ms. Srbljanovic.

Last edited at 06:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Biljana_Srbljanović/Archive_1&oldid=1237767172"