Talk:Bilanga Department

Notability and refs tag

Has a ref, is a second level administrative unit of Burkina Faso. Take a look again at the notability guidelines. T L Miles (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Excuse my blindness and point me to the specific guideline you are referring to... WP:NOTE states: "The common theme in the notability guidelines is the requirement for verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability." I see no exception for second level administrative units of Burkina Faso. Wikipedia:Notability (Places and transportation) is still a proposal, and regardless does not address administrative units. Wikipedia:Notability (geography) is an essay at this point, and does discuss the idea that if you can provide sources, legally recognized places exist. Please note that only guidelines represent consensus.

Now, I do not doubt that this or any other second-level administrative department of Burkina Faso exists and I am not suggesting the article be deleted... I imagine it probably is notable and probably has reliable information out there about it. The problem is that the article does not cite any evidence of notability and any reliable sources, so I tagged to alert readers and editors of that.--Marcinjeske (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Whatever. There are 87,000+ people who live there according to the government of Burkina Faso. If you'd like to substantially challenge its notability, go right ahead, and then you can go back to writing about something important like Max Headroom (TV series). I am removing the ref tag, as the references section has a ref which lists all the villages and population. If you'd like to improve the article, be my guest, but I'm taking it off my watchlist. Enjoy. T L Miles (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This seems like a pointless tagging to me: it's notable by any reasonable definition, it's referenced, and it's in an area we should be looking to actively expanding our coverage, for CSB reasons. That it lacks a specific reference as to its notability -- above and beyond, as TLM says, "merely" being a place where tens of thousands of people live, and an official subdivision of a country seems to me to be being unhelpfully cheese-paring. I'm re-removing the tag. Alai (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bilanga Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324000000/http://www.inforoute-communale.gov.bf/list_vill/est.htm to http://www.inforoute-communale.gov.bf/list_vill/est.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)