Talk:Big Painting No. 6/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Lead is a bit short. Surely it can be expanded on further?
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- It once set a record auction price for a painting by a living American artist. --> For how much?
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Big Painting No. 6 is in the Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen collection in Düsseldorf. --> Unsourced
- ref added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure if details is the best title for the heading. Description, maybe?
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Critical commentary --> Reception
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- I see no other issues with the article. It is well referenced and written.
- All issues addressed. Passing the article! Statυs (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Way too much copyrighted material in the footnotes. No excuse for this. Editor should have used his own words. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)