Talk:Big Five Aspect Scales

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Big Five personality traits
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Big Five personality traits

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JakieraTD, QueenSuicune, Jaybrown0502.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

considered for deletion

It appears that this page was marked to be considered for deletion because an image on it was believed to be infringing copyright. That image has been removed from the page and from the commons; so it seems there is no longer any reason to delete this page as it doesn't appear to violate any guidelines. -- thisma^talk 05:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do wonder if this article should be merged with Big Five personality traits. There appears to currently be no reference to this there. -- thisma^talk 05:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

NOT MERGED

Procedural close following AfD result. (non-admin closure) Jalen Folf (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose Big Five Aspect Scales be merged into Big Five personality traits. I believe it is easier to explain the scales test/service in the context of its subject (the Big Five personality traits). The Scales article is tiny, so size won't be a problem. The scales article is marked to be considered for deletion; but the reason for that has been resolved. Everything seems perfect. I would just do it, except for that not yet closed deletion consideration. -- thisma^talk 06:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will support a merger. I have this page on my Watchlist, so I will chime in when you submit the formal merger request. - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 12:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.