Talk:Biconical antenna

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biconical antenna article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Untitled

Hi

The sentence fragment "transceiving signals from 30 MHz to 300 MHz" is incorrect as can be seen in the pictures and elsewhere Biconical antennas can be used from around 20MHz through to above 20 GHz, an individual Bicone can function over several octaves within this range.

--194.201.250.209 11:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Steve Cole[reply]

Fixed frequency range statement to use octaves instead. 3 octaves is based on the listed frequency ranges of antennas in the article, i.e. .5-3.0 GHz, 1-18 GHz, 30 to 300 MHz, are all about 3 octaves, sometimes more.

74.193.185.169 19:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google research seems to indicate that the preferred name for this class of antenna is biconic not biconical. 75.140.251.185 (talk) 04:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion page for discone antenna. Applicable here, as the two are merely distinct usages of the same theory and math.

75.140.251.185 (talk) 08:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck are these antennas used for?

What the heck are these antennas used for? Would these make good UHF TV antennas? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.130.47 (talk) 02:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are used for measurements of RF fields and as general purpose wideband reception antennas. They are no good for TV reception as they are not directive so they don't reject ghost images from reflections. Sv1xv (talk) 20:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the bow tie antenna is a flat version of this antenna, and is frequently used for tv reception. Of course, lots of bad antenans are used on tvs. This antenna can be used any time you need a broad band omnidirectional antenna. I see that someone added a picture of one and labeled it "butterfly" and specifically said it was for tv. Commercial bow tie antennas are typically just a stiff wire in that shape. --ssd (talk) 15:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]