Jump to content

Talk:Bibliography of the Holocaust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

resources

[edit]

I just realized that http://www.anti-rev.org/ is missing in the list, (maybe I have not read carefuly, maybe it's there). Given that that site has a considerable amount of material, I wonder why it is not there. Am I missing something? Fadix 01:00, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No need to ask, if you think it belongs you should add. Stbalbach 02:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have add the WWW VL Zeitgeschichte again. It's in German but one of the best sources about Third Reich, WW II and Holocaust. It is maintainded by the important Historisches Centrum Hagen and use www.vl-zeitgeschichte.de as second url. The Historisches Centrum Hagen is the host of the VL Zeitgeschichte. The VL Zeitgeschichte is no "Linkspam" [08:30, 12 June 2006 Jergen (rv linkspam)].

--Scholl 18:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have delete the Link to the *German site about the shoah This ist a German site and if the admin jergen said that German sites such as Virtual Library Zeitgeschichte are not specific "and in German", I think that is not the right place for this private page. --Scholl 15:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Aemathisphd 10:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some jackass has put "One Third of the Holocaust" in the movie links. It is a denier film.

Andrew E. Mathis, Ph.D. The Holocaust History Project

--Aemathisphd 10:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi Archive Made Public

[edit]

After 60 years, Nazi archives have been made public. See the CBS News report here. [1] I have added this link to resources under "Documentation and Evidence." RonCram 16:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The "Overlooked Millions: Non-Jewish Victims of the Holocaust" link doesn't work anymore. Is it to be deleted, or to be put into the Wayback Machine? Herindes 22:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it, as (you're right) it went to a 404 page. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 22:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I notice that there are no links to any Holocaust denail sites on this page and am curious as to the reasoning why. I inquire here as a participant in both the Armenian Genocide and genocide denial articles. In the former there has been and currently is a great deal of pressure to include links to what I believe are hate sites and denying sites that are genocide perpetuation enablers (through their minsinformation and denial). Unfortunately I find myself as the lone voice opposing inclusion of such sites in the links and thus it is likely that they will be included. In addition to my belief that inclusion of such is wrong in the Armenian Genocide article I'm fearful that such could create a precident for here and in other genocide articles. So I am curious as to your rational for not inclusing such here and if it might be of help in my struggle to keep the AG article free of such filfth. I appreciate any comment or insite here or on the Armenian Genocide talk page itself. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Armenian_Genocide#External_Links Thanks in advance.--THOTH 15:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I should add that it is the position of at least one person on the talk page over there who is advocating that any "relevant and notable" website should be linked. IMO - if this is indeed policy - then any site - regardless of scholarly merit or facuality could or should be linked. Thus sites such as the Institute of Historical Review and such would be considered appropriate for sourcing here. You can imagine that I don't feel that this is appropriate policy for Wikipedia.--THOTH 16:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here too is an example of a position taken by a prominant editor of the AG article - "Also, I don't see what is the problem of adding "revisionist" sites, official positions in any case should remain here, I do not agree their exclusion on the Holocaust article, one wrong does not justify another." --THOTH 16:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • This page does not only include websites but also works. Had there been a section on the Armenian Genocide on works, very few revisionist books will be there since just a couple such book published in the west exist, only under 5 which are really notable. The issue is on websites, you can bring it, but consider this, Holocaust denial is illegal in various countries, and websites are regulated too, there is no such regulation in the case of the Armenian Genocide which makes an obvious difference. Fad (ix) 03:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Frank

[edit]

The Anne Frank diary seems to be missing from the article. Badagnani 10:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaim Yisroel Eiss

[edit]

I have removed the bullet point about Chaim Yisroel Eiss because the only reference it gave is to the Chaim Yisroel Eiss Wikipedia article, the factual accuracy of which is under dispute. If anyone knows about this person and can provide viable references and citations, then please come and contribute to the Chaim Yisroel Eiss article, otherwise it may be deleted as a suspected hoax. Thanks. —gorgan_almighty 09:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Why did you take out hundreds of sites on holocaust memorials and educations sites off this page? I am livid!

--Herut (talk) 16:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A number of people have deleted the external links section under the notion that it is a "link farm". The Holocaust is one of the most complex and well documented historical events on the web and there are naturally going to be many vital resources. A link farm on this topic would be many 100s of links, considering the huge amount of material potentially available. There is no set number of links that are appropriate, but this particular topic will have more links than typical. 71.191.40.106 (talk) 03:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Formats

[edit]

I am no expert on biblio reference formats, but I do see that there is a lack of consistency; i.e. some have IBSN numbers and some don't, etc. Is there an easy way to clean this up or does someone have to spend a lot of time doing it one by one? --Joel Mc (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussed at WP:NOT

[edit]

I just asked a question concerning this article at [2]. --Sancho Mandoval (talk) 16:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This book has nothing to do with the Shoah

[edit]

I took the following book off the list, namely Germany Puts the Clock Back by Edgar Ansel Mowrer because it is about German politics in 1932. Since it deals with events that have nothing to do with the Shoah, inddeed was published before there was a Shoah, it does not belong here. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the same here with an An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945 by John Sack. This is particularly the case since it is not clear if the men profiled in Sack's book saw themselves as either Jewish and/or seeking revenge for the Shoah.--A.S. Brown (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bibliography of The Holocaust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bibliography of The Holocaust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bibliography of The Holocaust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section for photography?

[edit]

I think this article would benefit from some sort of section on the major sources of historic photographs documenting the Holocaust.--Pharos (talk) 21:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bibliography_of_the_Holocaust&oldid=1199984035"