Jump to content

Talk:Beylik of Tunis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

Ottomon sovereignty

[edit]

At what point was the theoretical vassalage to the Ottomans formally renounced? --Jfruh (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this correct ?

[edit]

"Although defeating the Deys in theory, Tunisia continued to be a vassal of the Ottoman empire and the Friday prayer was pronounced in the name of the Ottoman Sultan,..."

Isn't this statement back to front ? If Husseyn took over effective control of Tunis from Turkish rule, then he defeated them "de facto" while continuing the pretence of "de jure" vassalage. That would not be a theoretical defeat for the Turks.Eregli bob (talk) 03:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The aricles overlap in many ways. Should not their be a link atleast? --77.169.238.179 (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

[edit]

The article explains the history of the Beylik of Tunis, but fails to explain what the Beylik of Tunis is. A definition would be welcome as the first sentence. -- 88.163.168.188 (talk) 07:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. What is it? A person? A title of honor? A role? A geographic area? A region? A formal place name? I have no idea after reading this article. Benefac (talk) 07:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repetitive/duplicate section

[edit]

The "Bankruptcy and establishment of protectorate" section at the bottom of the article duplicates the topic of the last subsection of the history section, "Financial crisis and foreign interference (1869–1881)". Even if they're intended to have different scope, the information in the bottom section should belong in the history section anyways; it would be confusing to split it across different parts of the article with other very different sections in between. I tried placing a duplication tag in the section but the wording it generates is a little confusing for this purpose, so I'm just noting it here instead. I'd do it myself but there's a mix of sourced and unsourced material in both sections and it's more than I have time for; hopefully another interested editor could sort it out. R Prazeres (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corsair flag

[edit]

Corsair flag of Tunisia resembled the Hamsa in shape and dimensions.

03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)43.242.178.68 (talk)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)43.242.178.68 (talk)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)~\\\\\\\[reply]