Talk:Bethlehem Works

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lehigh Valley

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lehigh Valley, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lehigh ValleyWikipedia:WikiProject Lehigh ValleyTemplate:WikiProject Lehigh ValleyLehigh Valley articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Citation (and other) issues

First, upon digging through this article's two citations for another project, it became clear that nothing before 2004 in the article is cited, and couldn't have come from either source.

It also became clear that Bethlehem Works means different things to different people, especially now that more than two decades have passed since much of this happened. My understanding is that, strictly speaking, Bethlehem Works was the planned arts district and commercial development proposed in the late nineties by Bethlehem Steel and never built. In popular understanding, it seems to have been applied to the land itself the area was proposed for. It may also refer to the area controlled by Bethworks Now, a company that ultimately developed the site, and/or the BethWorks LERTA tax district, which encompasses virtually the entire former Bethlehem Steel plant. For many, BethWorks appears to be synonymous with SteelStacks, the arts district that was ultimately built on the Bethlehem Steel campus. Currently, the Google result for SteelStacks links to this Bethlehem Works article.

I'm adding a couple of cleanup tags. I intend to work on resolving these issues, with the hope that once I finish an article on SteelStacks i'm working on, I will have a clearer understanding of what exactly BethWorks refers to, and therefore how to approach this article.

I'm thinking the best overall strategy for the various facets of the Bethlehem Steel redevelopment may be to either roll most of this history into Bethlehem Steel, or have an article comprehensively addressing the redevelopment of the former Bethlehem Steel complex in Bethlehem, and then deeper articles on individual projects (like Wind Creek Bethlehem, Hoover-Mason Trestle, BethWorks, etc.) as appropriate. I'd love some input on this. Admiral Boots (talk) 01:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I agree. This article should be merged with Beth. Steel Dincher 00:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bethlehem Works. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mcall.com/news/local/all-4counciloct04,0,369169.story
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061022090912/http://www.saveoursteel.org:80/ to http://www.saveoursteel.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]