Talk:Bethesda Presbyterian Church (Russellville, Tennessee)

A fact from Bethesda Presbyterian Church (Russellville, Tennessee) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Bethesda Presbyterian Church in Russellville, Tennessee, closed after its congregants' sympathies split between the opposing sides of the American Civil War?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bethesda Presbyterian Church (Russellville, Tennessee).

Wikipedia

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Bethesda Presbyterian Church (Russellville, Tennessee) is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

"ornate"

"Ornate" doesn't actually help the reader visualize the pulpit. Apparently it is carved in some fashion.--Wetman (talk) 02:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that comment. I agree that "ornate" isn't a good descriptor, but we can only report what the sources say -- we can't guess at what they mean. The word "ornate" came from a source, so I put it in quotation marks. This webpage (not cited in the article) states that the pulpit is enclosed. --Orlady (talk) 03:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found an image of the pulpit on Pinterest (not viable as a source) -- IMO, the pulpit looks elaborate (I wouldn't say "ornate" if I were describing it), but it's not carved. --Orlady (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC) After seeing that photo, I recognize the pulpit in the photo on the historical marker, which is the source that called it "ornate". --Orlady (talk) 03:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]