Talk:Bethe–Feynman formula
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Better formula
[edit]In Glasstone's Introduction to Nuclear Weapons there is a derivation and explanation of the formula. It neglects a division by 7 which would align it with Frisch-Peierls, approximately. This is found in section 2.45: https://nige.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/glasstone-introduction-to-nuclear-weapons-72b.pdf The result would be a more conventional representation of the formula, aligned with the representation in the following paper: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00295450.2021.1909372?needAccess=true 129.169.46.84 (talk) 12:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)