Talk:Beth Mead/GA1

Review summary

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Hi Spiderone, I saw the nom at women's football task force so thought why not, will make a start on this soon. I'll be way less critical than Keira Walsh GA though, I'd like to think I've learnt a lot since then. I'll start with sources then move to content. CNC (talk) 14:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Sources look good, was expecting a lot more broken ones based on early content. The only marginally reliable source I came across was WP:DAILYMIRROR, but the claims aren't outrageous and is backed by other source as well so looks fine.

The only other questionable or broken sources were:

Mead hoping for more moments of magic, broken ref, couldn't find archive link
"Player Stats – UEFA Women's EURO 2022" broken ref, couldn't find archive link
Supporters Club Player of the Season - is this really due, based on lack of secondary sourcing? The would be OK as primary, but their website is up for sale. It doesn't seem particularly notable, unless I missing something here...
Press Release: Celebrities urge PM to think again on refugees, this could do with secondary source as group appears non-notable, and from a brief search I didn't find any. Maybe this is best just removed, otherwise doesn't seem due either.
"The Sports Book Awards". Waterstones, this is more content related, but the source says "Children’s Sports Book of the Year", and I couldn't find a source for being The Times for autobiography of the year in May 2023. Wrong source, or wrong content?

CNC (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CommunityNotesContributor: many thanks for the source review! I've made some amendments on each of the points. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]