Talk:Bernardino Nogara

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

European Microstates: Vatican City

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City.

POV

this page appears to have been written by one person. The references are all dependent on three sources. These three sources are suspect of being hostile to catholicism. Peppermintschnapps (talk) 14:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage you to add information from whatever other sources are available. Nogara is an unfortunately obscure figure, and I have added everything I have found so far. Savidan 17:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nogara

I arrive at Nogara from online of Pope Pius XI . The reviews of the John F. Pollard Money and the Rise of the Modern Papacy-Financing the Vatican are here http://www.eh.net/bookreviews/library/0944.shtml

It seems Ernesto Pacelli preceeded Nogara as the Holy Sees 'funds' manager . I find the reference to 'corporations' in S.America reminding me of the Bill Dorich Federal case 'on' in California . Ernesto's nephews included also Pope Pius XII , and we see this Pope's brother Francesco noted in relation to the Lateran Treaty . Famekeeper 09:28, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

This edit that I reverted is original research. Generally speaking, theses articles should be written from secondary sources, not from primary sources like the Actes. In fact, this edit illustrates the danger of OR. The fact that the Vatican had purchased food in time1 in no way disproves that they purchased something else in time2 and told someone else that it was food. In fact, there is nothing in the Actes, much less in any secondary source, to connect the food purchase to Nogara. Savidan 14:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Software Problem with ths page

On loading this page, parts of the images, i.e. picture of Nogara, obscure whole sections of the text. But if one clicks on the Nogara picture and then cancel it, the problem disappears. This must be an problem with the software. Does anyone know how to fix it? Pmg1000 (talk) 10:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: The problem was with my Windows XP and Google. Changed to a computer with Windows 7 and Google Chrome and the problem disappeared. Pmg1000 (talk) 12:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bernardino Nogara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060506013532/http://www.revistasice.com/Estudios/Documen/ice/812/ICE8120304.PDF to http://www.revistasice.com/Estudios/Documen/ice/812/ICE8120304.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bernardino Nogara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524102440/http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FHIS%2FHIS42_04%2FS0018246X9900861Xa.pdf&code=a9e453324af4764db38b329bcd41b762 to http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FHIS%2FHIS42_04%2FS0018246X9900861Xa.pdf&code=a9e453324af4764db38b329bcd41b762

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]