Talk:Berliner-Joyce OJ

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Improvements

I've made some changes to this article which are, I hope, clearly marked in the History. I hope that my changes represent an improvement, and I apologize if I have inadvertently "blundered" into someone else's work. Also, being a newbie here, I thought I'd better refrain from trying to improve the list of references/citations and the referencing in general. This, frankly, looks a bit tangled to me now. Alexsuvoroff (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The work looks good. Don't be afraid to edit when you see something that needs improving; jolly cooperation is the basis of Wikipedia, after all. As for the references, a lot of these older aircraft articles are frankly pretty cruddy there, so cleaning up and rationalising (taking, say, the three cites to one book here and making them one citation) is always a good thing. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]