Talk:Berge Meere und Giganten/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I have never read any books by Döblin, but would like some day :)
- He's great, and there's always something new to find. Sindinero (talk) 08:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Lead should be larger. For example, the section "Genesis and publication" is not summarized in the lead--♫GoP♫TCN 19:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Will continue later
- I pretty much enjoyed the prose. Imagine one will read from top to bottom, and then discovers that there is no English translation available to date :P.
- I have never read any books by Döblin, but would like some day :)
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Use a consistent style, eg " 790-792" and then "155-7" (you should use the first version, as the latter is misleading)
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall: Great article!
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: