Talk:Benjamin Harrison/GA1

GA Review

Hello. I'm sorry to inform the editors of this article that I am failing it due to the amount of work needed to get it to GA status. That said, I have looked through some of the article history and am impressed with the work done thus far. Here are some suggestions for improvement:

Make sure words are wikilinked the first time they appear. For example, Indiana is wikilinked the third time it appears, not the first (not counting Indianapolis, Indiana. Go through all the sections and make sure everything is linked properly (and only once per section).
The legacy section seems like a trivia section to me. This might be because it is in bullet form...try making it into prose. Also, most of the assertions need sources.
The media sample seems out of place at the end of the article. I think it needs to be up in the presidential firsts section (next to where it is mentioned in the text). If you need help figuring out how to do this, take a look at some musical artists' articles, most of which have media samples integrated all throughout the article.
The caption for The Raven image is far too long. See WP:CAPTION.
Significant events: this list seems un-necessary to me. The events should be listed and explained in the prose itself.
Likewise, I also think Supreme Court appointments and States admitted to the Union should be turned into prose and integrated into the article prose.
There were a couple of citation needed tags that need to be taken care of. I also read the article and added a few more where I think a citation should be.
The article needs copyediting, especially for the dash usage. "–" goes between numbers and dates. "-" goes in hyphenated words. "—" goes in the text instead of a "--".
I question the notability of some of the facts, in particular: "On June 7, 1892, Harrison became the first President to ever attend a baseball game."
In the middle paragraph of the lead, I'd add some more information about his major policies and goings on while in office. His signing of the Sherman Antitrust Act seems worthy enough to mention.
Some of the images are far away from the text they illustrate (like the political football image). You can align some of the pictures to the left of the text, as well, which should help with this problem (and will decrease the long line of images on the right).
While peer reviews are never mandatory, it is a great option to get some more feedback.

I have no doubt that the editors of this article will step it up and continue to improve the article. Feel free to renominate when these issues are taken care of. Happy editing! Nikki311 02:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that these issues need resolved, however, is it fair to give this a speedy failure? I can resolve all these issues in about an hour or so... I guess I will fix them and then submit again.. and wait a couple more monthes for someone to review it? Charles Edward 23:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]