Talk:Ben Langa

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 February 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I see there is some question of whether this person's life and story is notable enough to have an article. Logically, the linked-to articles about his brothers should then also come into question: putting aside Ben's personal qualities etc., if his brothers themselves are notable, having a sibling assassinated is an important part of their stories. Of course the content of this article could be embedded in each of those articles, but what's the harm in instead linking each to this one? Michaelgraaf (talk) 14:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a born and bred South African and admin on the Afrikaans Wikipedia, if articles like this is deemed not be important enough then Wikipedia is in trouble. Ben Langa is 100 more important than some these of the quasi singers/actors created on the English Wikipedia. Or is it blatant dicrimination against African content? Oesjaar (talk) 19:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we all hate South Africans; well discerned. Alternatively, it could be that we have sourcing requirements for determining notability that have to be followed, and discussions such as the related AfD are the method to figure out threshold cases. Pick your option. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a conscious plot to delete South African content, but I do wish that WP:WORLDVIEW would be kept in mind before articles are nominated for deletion.Park3r (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wish away; that complaint is unrelated to the simple requirements of having x number of sources of y quality for any article, whether it's about an American YouTuber, a Nigerian rapper, or a model of gravel auger. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was already resolved in AFD, so there's no point resurrecting it here, suffice to say that there actually were WP:RS in Google Books. The fact is that there are plenty of reliable sources on South African topics, but not many web pages. In fact, a lot of web-only content is often a red flag for self-promotion in SA topics. Park3r (talk) 09:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it doesn't have to be web content. Citing books is just fine. Someone just has to find the stuff, and frequently that takes subject experts, which an AfD tends to attract. I think ending one by rescuing the article is always the most desirable outcome. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]