Talk:Bell Mobility

When editing the article we really should try to stay neutral and cite all sources. RB

Bell Mobility is a division of BCE Bell Canada Enterprise is the right name not bell canada. FCL

Actually, Bell Mobility is a subsidiary of Bell Canada, which is a subsidiary of BCE.--64.46.3.199 02:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i think in the section where it notes that bell sometimes disables features of the device, it should say that unlike TELUS, they do not alter the user interface on most phones —Preceding unsigned comment added by CreepyMan (talk • contribs) 06:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Telus customizes their phones too. The manufacturers also customize them. Not putting a feature in the phone may also make it cheaper for the carrier to buy from the manufacturer then sell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.230.52 (talk) 01:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Every company phone company in canada is guilty of phone crippling. telus and bell do it. rogers may not cripple their phones as far as bluetooth transfer is concerned. but often cripples features such as wifi and gps. i think these topics should be removed or at least edited. should this article reflect opinion? that wouldnt be wikipedia, and negative reaction to phone crippling sounds like opinion.

the same can be said for this market analysis. what does that have to do with a wikipedia page on this company- jawsome —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuaawsome (talk • contribs) 04:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History Section Needed

Bell Mobility used to be Bell Cellular. Did you know Bell Cellular had the world's first voicemail system for cellphones back in the decade of the 80's. See Voicemail which already mentions this. Please create a history section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.217.92.28 (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bias

This page reads as very biased against Bell Mobility. Wikipedia is in tended as being a non-biased lexicon of information, yet this page reads as an anti-system access fee rant. Where is talk of bell rich history or maybe some information on what this company offers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuaawsome (talk • contribs) 07:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont find this biased that much. If a company has a good service record a controversy section wont be present. The classic saying goes is that there is a whole article on crtisism/controvesy of wal mart due to their corporate practices. The plain fact is some people have controverseys against bell mobility's service/policy practices and these have been sourced in the article (in fact its a lot smaller than it could be). I looked at the rogers wireless article and their is not a controversy/crticism section, perhaps one could be added there to balance things out if people can find the information necessary. Ottawa4ever (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell Mobility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423220500/http://mobiletv.bell.ca:80/ to http://mobiletv.bell.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell Mobility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]