Talk:Beechcraft Duchess

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beechcraft Duchess article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aircraft

Hmm..

Not in total agreement with the text on this A/C. Many student pilots refer to the Piper Seminole as being under powered and the Beechcraft Duchess as being the more favourable kissing cousin..

J.

I agree with this statement... I've found the Seminole to be underpowered compared to the Duchess. ChadScott 00:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If anything less engine power makes single engine training easier. There is no requirement to hold altitude only airspeed and heading. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.113.50.250 (talk) 07:41, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

I put back the part about altitude holding not being required on practical tests because it isn't. http://www.faa.gov/education_research/testing/airmen/test_standards/pilot/media/FAA-S-8081-14A.pdf Light twin airplanes are not required to hold altitude single engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arf says (talk • contribs) 03:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]