Talk:Beechcraft Baron

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beechcraft Baron article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

United States C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Agree, it needs to be merged. Akradecki 17:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No opposition after over a month. Merging. - BillCJ 22:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Price

There is a reference from a commercial website. http://www.controller.com/listings/detail.aspx?OHID=1123372 I am not sure if we can post commercial websites as references. Aldo L (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Somebody Should Have Left This Sentence Short.

"As expensive to operate as it is to buy, the 'next step up' from a Baron is a very big one." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.170.171 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beechcraft Baron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beechcraft Baron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

T-42A use by U.S. Navy?

Joe Baugher's website says that three T-42As went to the Navy, and his information is extremely reliable in my experience, but nothing in my extensive library about naval aviation says anything about them and nothing shows up in Google. I wonder if the Navy took possession simply because the Army was getting rid of them, but no plan to use them ever came to fruition (this would not be a unique occurrence; fortunately they were not destroyed as targets!). Does anyone have any information? It may not be appropriate to list the Navy under "Users". Carguychris (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EM-11 Orka

Is it appropriate to include the EM-11 Orka as a comparable aircraft, when it's strictly a four-seater that was developed decades later, and as far as I can tell, it has never entered production? Carguychris (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing per WP:BOLD. Carguychris (talk) 21:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]