This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Becket controversy is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints
A fact from Becket controversy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that due to the Becket controversy, from 1163 to 1173 no new bishops were appointed in England?
Ealdgyth, sorry for that last edit - I was moving some material across different tabs, and hit delete on the wrong one! My mistake, thanks for catching it, Hchc2009 (talk) 17:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I kinda figured that it was a boo-boo, no worries at all! The sandbox is looking great ... let me know when you want me to start disecting... Ealdgyth - Talk17:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think it proper to refer to a political murder—or any death, really—as a martyrdom in an objective historic account. The word concedes too much to the belief system whose adherents quickly proclaimed Thomas Becket a martyr and have maintained such to this day. Even if one allows that someone who is killed for their religious beliefs, whatever those beliefs are, is a martyr, it seems a pretty egregious mischaracterization to apply that formula to the Becket-Henry II dispute or the actions and intentions of of knights who murdered him. I'm changing the word. Sebum-n-soda (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was not considered a "political murder" in the time period, however. That is reading back modern attitudes into medieval mindsets. Modern historians do use the word "martyr" to refer to Becket - Barlow does frequently in his biography, and Barlow's not exactly a great friend of religion. I removed the "claims of martyrdom" from the lead - it's not really necessary. The change of martyrdom to murder is indifferent to me. The lead is sparse because the article isn't finished yet - I have a very low tolerance for dealing with Becket and thus can only work on the article intermittantly before i want to strangle the guy. Ealdgyth - Talk12:13, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
