Talk:Bebe's Boobs Destroy Society

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Paramount Pictures#Paramount Home Entertainment|Paramount Home Entertainment]] Anchor Paramount Pictures#Paramount Home Entertainment links to a specific web page: Paramount Home Entertainment. The anchor (#Paramount Home Entertainment) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Both comments regarding the "ata" thing are absolutely irrelevant. First of all, he says "ata", not "ahtra", second of all ... why is it at all significant that "ata" means "twins" in Norwegian? I seriously, seriously doubt Parker and Stone were alluding to that, and otherwise, it's not particularly interesting as a coincidence either.

Are you forgetting that "twins" is a slang term for breasts? That might be where the significance lies.

Writers are being lazy?

Why do Wikipedia allow people to write things like: Perhaps the writers are just being lazy..." ? Surely this goes against Wikipedia's guidlines of being neutral in pages? Grieferhate 21:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's called vandalism. Editors remove it as soon as they see it, just as you did.--Swellman 23:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Censoration... anymore?

I took away the info about a censored scene. i have seen the episode on TV but it was not censored, but i think now it was a wrong move...and so on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.11.35.212 (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs

I just watched the episode and when the boys go to Bebe's house to watch Terrance and Philip, Kyle's voice is dubbed on Stan. Should this be added? 76.68.106.220 (talk) 01:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited material

Cite please;

The main plot of this episode is a parody of the movie Slums of Beverly Hills, in which the protagonist grows breasts and gains a new level of popularity among the male crowd, and attempts to get breast reduction surgery.
In this episode, Cartman often plays a game called "Lambs", which uses toys to re-enact a scene from The Silence of the Lambs.
Planet of the Apes and 2001: A Space Odyssey are parodied while the boys act like cavemen. A space shuttle crashes outside Bebe's house, and two astronauts climb out. On asking the boys to call 911, and hearing only the caveman-like grunts the boys make, the astronauts conclude that they have landed in the future, as in Planet of the Apes, and proceed to shoot themselves, declaring "Take your ape world and go to hell!". 2001 was also parodied in the “Trapper Keeper” and “The Tooth Fairy Tats 2000” episodes.
Stan, while in his caveman persona, calls boobs “ah-tah,” a word meaning "fire" in the language of the characters of the movie Quest for Fire.
The scene of Bebe’s boobs conspiring while she’s asleep is a parody of a similar scene involving hands in Quicksilver Highway.
One of the boys (Token) near the end of the episode says “Fire, bad!”, referencing Frankenstein.

Alastairward (talk) 11:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These are cultural references, not theories which require proof. If you also note that each one has a link to the wikipedia article which it claims that reference is made to, they are actually cited. I see no good reason to remove them and so am re-inserting them. 77.99.20.254 (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless your cite is from a reputable source, stating what the creators of the show meant by including a scene or line of script, then all you're doing is citing speculation. Referring to another wikipedia article as "proof" is circular logic and unacceptable. Alastairward (talk) 08:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear...these ARE references. I doubt there is any source that would dispute this. What is your real objection?! Also, a major reference is the entire scene which is lifted right out of Mad Max II (with 'just walk away'). The fact that Butters is dressed in a gimp mask and Kenny gets a boomerang in the face, the girls are wearing the armour and defending an oil depot which explodes in a ball of flame...hang on...this is all complete conjecture...there is no proof that this is what the writers intended to show so we have to exclude it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.219.39 (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon my lack of wikiskills, but I just have to rant.. Alastairward, do you suffer from brain damage? Have you actually editet every article regarding episodes of every single series and taken away all the cultural references? You're right, we have no idea what the creators were actually thinking when the wrote what they wrote, but so what? The majority of us still think of something funny when we see these eligible "references" while watching, so it makes more a phisical sence to keep them. - John —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.18.92 (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL please. But besides that, I add material to articles too, I just prefer to cite it first. In any case, your comments aren't really related to the article. Alastairward (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can one trash talk in a more civil way than I did!? And how is this not related? We're discussing your removal of article content, it is as related to the article as anything can ever be. - John

"John", please read WP:CIVIL, WP:NOR, WP:SYNTH, WP:V. Alastairward (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriusly, I have no interest reading that whatsoever, as I am not contributing to wikipedia by editing articles. As for what goes on in the discussion; there shouldn't be rules regarding code of frickin conduct. Man up. I just came here to read trivia about a south park episode I just watched, only to find that you've fucked things up. Fortunately, I know my way around diff-tools and got hold of them anyway.