Talk:Beazer Homes USA

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Adding citations to accountant firing paragraph

I have moved this original paragraph to the talk area because it contained no citations or easily accessed references online...and it looks like they do exist. The Wall Street Journal article required a subscription to view the full article (including the quote listed in the main page article), and there were other sources available via Bloomberg and the SEC website that provided pretty much the same info. I edited the main page paragraph to reflect the sources that were available to the casual reader...I don't think the spokesperson quote is significant or exclusive enough (i.e. saying anything beyond what a company's first response would typically be) to keep without citation, but since it seems to be (so far) the only official response, I'm tagging it for citation as a reminder instead of removing it.
"On June 28, 2007, Beazer Homes said announced that it fired its chief accounting officer for attempting to destroy documents. The move comes as Beazer faces probes into its mortgage practices. Beazer disclosed the firing of Michael Rand in a regulatory filing, the Wall Street Journal and other news agencies reported on June 28, 2007. The Wall Street Journal said Rand, 44 and a 10-year Beazer veteran, could not be reached for comment. "We have informed the U.S. attorney's office and the SEC about this issue," Beazer spokeswoman Leslie Kratckoski told the Wall Street Journal. She said an internal investigation by the company's audit committee, assisted by independent legal counsel, continues." Flowanda 00:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some balance please

I created this article earlier this year because it was a Fortune 500 company and a major home builder/financier. But what this page has primarily become is a documentation of all the trouble it's in. I'm not saying that the "2007 Investigations and Litigation" section isn't true, but it just seems too long as compared to other articles on companies that come under investigation. --Oakshade 23:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agreed. Tagging for NPOV review and will try to take a closer look as soon as I can. Feel free to jump in; to me this seems to need a lot of work on NPOV. Panchitaville^talk 04:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this still an issue? I'm bothered that about 90% of the article is a list of litigation. --Ollie Garkey (talk) 22:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is still an ongoing issue. Any changes made previously have not been accepted. What can we do to get the page updated and have it stay in place? It is way unbalanced in favor of negative proceedings. --lcoates1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the scale of criminality, and the enormous consequences, I do not see any problem with keeping and expanding the sections on the financial fraud this company engaged in. Adding a NPOV section on the company's history is of course appropriate.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Agreement

Despite the legal issues, there are many aspects of Beazer Homes that could be covered here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.64.252 (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

origin

When was the company founded and under what circumstances? Deipnosophista (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESmart Green.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:ESmart Green.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

50,000,000 million

In this sentence bolded million is a surplus?: "Under the deferred prosecution agreement, Beazer agrees to pay $10,000,000 immediately toward restitution for victimized home-buyers, and additional money as Beazer recovers financially, up to $50,000,000 million."--Palapa (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Logo

The logo for Beazer Homes has changed. I've removed the old logo, but need to add the new one. Can someone please advise on how to do that. New logo can be seen here - http://www.beazer.com/ Lcoates1 (talk) 15:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)lcoates1[reply]

History of Beazer

This could be updated and linked to the Beazer wikipedia page - http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Beazer. The US business was founded from this same Beazer family. Lcoates1 (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)lcoates1[reply]

Introduction

Maybe take out the Fortune 500 part? It hasn't been in the list for a long time, at least since the Financial Crisis. Its 2014 Total Revenue (according to Investor Relations page http://ir.beazer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=98372&p=irol-reportsannual) was 1.464 billion dollars. Even the 1000th company in Fortune 1000, E*Trade Financial, has 2.019 billion dollars revenue in 2014 (http://fortune.com/fortune500/etrade-financial-1000/).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beazer Homes USA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513201651/http://today.reuters.com:80/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews to http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=2007-05-03T221901Z_01_N03433110_RTRIDST_0_BEAZER-UPDATE-2.XML

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]