Talk:Beauvoir (Biloxi, Mississippi)

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Top-importance).

"President" Davis?

The article makes repeated reference to "President" Davis. Of course, his status as "President" was never recognized by the United States, and, by the time he began living at Beauvoir, he had ceased being President of the Confederate States in any event. I believe that the references to "President" should be replaced with "Mr." or with "Jefferson," as appropriate.

John Paul Parks (talk) 14:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Katrina and "Demise"

Thanks for changing that Katrina note. I've just added the fulltext of the ALA description of the damage. It seems garbled, but interpreting it looks to me like the house is OK altho lost a lot but the library "first floor" is gone and so the building may be. Don't want to say "for sure" yet -- "destroyed" -- not until structural engineers say so.

The house will be repaired, certainly -- they'll rebuild that entirely "as was" if they have to -- not so the library, tho, but which probably needed upgrading anyway and now will qualify for funds for a rebuild. So "damaged and possibly destroyed" seems to fit here, now.

Lots of interest on the "library" lists and "Southern" lists and "rare book" lists, about this, so I thought the article ought to be uptodate & complete & accurate but also cautious.

--Kessler 21:35, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New York Times report

We now have a more detailed report from the New York Times. Looks like the news is much better than what the Jackson Clarion-Ledger first repoerted. Realkyhick 16:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apostrophes

I corrected throughout the improper use of "it's" to indicate the possessive, and other grammar problems in the section on the damage from Katrina. The substance remains the same.

Redirection from Beauvoir

I really don't think "Beauvoir" should redirect to this page, but instead should go to the disambiguation page. Is this page really more important than Simone de Beauvoir for example? Fayefox 17:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beauvoir misdirected

I am moving name "Beauvoir" (in the English Wikipedia) back to the famous American home of Jefferson Davis, built in 1848, the U.S. National Historic Landmark discussed in recent news, which is being restored after Hurricane Katrina. The American home continues to be the intended target for all but one existing wikilink to "Beauvoir" (the other link was for a place in France), so the decision was obvious: redirect to the article intended by over 90% of article links. That redirection will resolve the majority of those article links, leaving just 1 to disambiguation, from Beauvoir (Biloxi, Mississippi).

Three-month trial: In November 2006, the name "Beauvoir" had been redirected to "Simone de Beauvoir" even though no Wikipedia articles at all linked that usage, and 94% of all WP references to "Beauvoir" mentioned the Jefferson Davis home, 6% mention a place in France, and no articles mention any person, living or dead, as "Beauvoir" in a link. After 3 months, the problem was still the same: absolutely no wikilinks intended "Beauvoir" as the name of a person.

POV push? - For most of 2006, the term "Beauvoir" was logically redirected to the home of that name, the famous home of Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederacy, built in 1848, predating the 1911 Britannica. Several articles all linked to "Beauvoir" as meaning that same mansion built in the 19th century.

Then, according to some unknown agenda, in November 2006, the term was redirected to "Simone de Beauvoir" (born 1908) for the author who gained fame 100 years after the Beauvoir mansion was built, even though there were no Wikipedia articles linked to "Beauvoir" as meaning that person. In the past 3 months, no articles yet have been linked to "Beauvoir" as meaning any person, just places (one as a region in France, and the rest meaning the Davis mansion).

Perhaps someone wanted "Beauvoir" to have the impact of "Einstein" (201 wikilinks) as an iconic name for the person, but Wikipedia usage has favored the home (named exactly "Beauvoir") as the link intended. All progress has come full circle: the use of a specified name tends to be linked to an object of that exact name, as is the case for articles linking the Beauvoir mansion. Meanwhile, after 3 more months, the author is still considered and linked by name "Simone de Beauvoir" rather than by an iconic last name (such as "Einstein").

Lessons learned:

Redirect a name to the object most likely to be mentioned by that exact name.
Also, give precedence to a name used 60-100 years earlier in mainstream history.
Beware of anyone redirecting a term to an article that has no absolutely no links, whatsoever, using that term, in any manner in any article, anywhere, at any time.
If an article does get redirected through a name that is never used, check the links 3 months later to confirm the long-term mistake and correct it before the problem spreads further.

Hopefully, the lessons learned will help focus WP efforts in the future, to avoid many hours of potential problems for other articles. --Wikid77 20:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beauvoir (Biloxi, Mississippi). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606054011/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1112&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1112&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]