Jump to content

Talk:Beacon Theatre (New York City)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rublov (talk · contribs) 12:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I will be reviewing this article shortly. Ruбlov (talkcontribs) 12:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiability

[edit]

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

  • Cited sources are reliable: The New York Times, Landmarks Preservation Commission, etc.

it contains no original research

  • Article is very well sourced.
  • I spot-checked a dozen or so of the citations, only found three minor issues:
    • The article says "The Beacon Theatre closed temporarily in March 2020", but the source just says that the theater was closed for more than a year; it doesn't explicitly say it closed in March 2020.
    • I don't have access to the article on ProQuest, but this New York Times article spells the name of the Yiddish vaudeville as "Bagels & Yox", not "Bagels & Vox".
    • "The stage can rise from its basement level carrying a full classical orchestra" – I couldn't verify this in the source, and I'm unclear as to what it means: is it describing some kind of elevator system?

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism

  • Copyright violation unlikely according to Earwig.

Breadth

[edit]

it addresses the main aspects of the topic

it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutrality

[edit]

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

Stability

[edit]

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Media

[edit]

media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

  • All images are freely licensed.

media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions


@Epicgenius: Good work as usual. Just a few comments from me. Ruбlov (talkcontribs) 13:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rublov: Thanks for the detailed review. I have addressed all of issues you've brought up now. Epicgenius (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, happy to pass. Ruбlov (talkcontribs) 16:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]