Jump to content

Talk:Beach Haven, New Zealand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

man there's some solid rambling on this page, I fixed it but seriously guys we need a decent page on Beach Haven that isnt full of opinionated drivel. Go to the stats site, thats got loads of info you could put in

We also need an immediate end to attacks on other editors by you. Mayalld (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry man, i only want to make the article better... i admit i got angry and i shouldnt have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tearaway88 (talkcontribs) 09:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it have a ferry? I've seen reference to one, but the only link I could dig up is one saying it stopped operating in 2004! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.235.139 (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it has a ferry which is written about but the ferry section hasnt been updated since 2013 and certainly needs an update, here's some information I found about the ferry service: https://at.govt.nz/projects-roadworks/beach-haven-ferry-wharf/, https://www.bellingham-marine.com/projects/beach-haven/ Thomas Norren (talk) 03:43, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Thomas Norren it may have a wharf, but there currently is no Beach Haven ferry listed by AT so the reference to a ferry should be removed. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source supports there being a ferry service, even if AT doesn't list one; however, AT do list one anyways: [1] Traumnovelle (talk) 04:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary news item removed

[edit]

I added the information about the shooting that took part in Beach Haven because I thought it was a relevant part of Beach Haven's history but the part was removed and the explanation was "Removed unnecessary news item" I think a shooting happening here is a significant enough event that it deserves to be mentioned as part of Beach Haven's history. But what do you guys think? Is there consensus that its not significant enough to be mentioned? Thomas Norren (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quite late but no primary sources about crimes occurring in the area are not suitable for inclusion. If a crime is mentioned in something like a history of the area it may be relevant but general crimes should not be added. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]