Talk:Bazel (software)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bazel (software) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rationale?
[edit]Before Bazel came along, there were 35 different build-automation systems (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_build_automation_software). Why did Google decide they needed a 36th, instead of enhancing one of the 35 (most of which are free open-source)?
(Note, I'm not asserting they pointlessly reinvented a wheel - I'm sure they had reasons - but I think the article should state what those reasons are or were.) Sayitclearly (talk) 08:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- I gave it an initial attempt at explaining the rationale. I'm fairly new to Bazel myself so errors in the text are quite possible, or descriptions may appear a bit vague or lacking specifics. Others with more knowledge are free to fill in and correct. Will add some links and references later tomorrow. Juhalindfors (talk) 01:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Google articles
- Low-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles