Talk:Bay Lake Tower

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hotels Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Part of Contemporary?

Should we move this article to Contemporary Resort? The tower is technically part of the Contemporary.—Preceding unsigned comment added by VmKid (talk • contribs) 23:39, 27 November 2009

It isn't part of the Contemporary, it is located on the location of the former North Garden Wing of the Contemporary and makes use of many services at the Contemporary, and the Contemporary is allowed to rent out rooms that have not been reserved by members, but is organized as a separate resort, has it's own facilities which are not available to Contemporary guests, and has rules that differ from Disney Resort rules. --HarryHenryGebel (talk) 23:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

View of the Magic Kingdom

I am removing the uncited criticism that the Bay Lake Tower has blocked the view for some guests at the Contemporary. The Bay Lake Tower is not even visible from any Magic Kingdom view room, nor is it located between and observation area and the Magic Kingdom. --HarryHenryGebel (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number or rooms

I corrected the number of rooms. There are 428 rooms in the Bay Lake Tower. The number 295 is the "two bedroom equivalent" ie, it counts one bedroom villas and their connecting deluxe studio villas as a single two bedroom villa (referred to as a lock-off in DVC lingo). --HarryHenryGebel (talk) 23:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Lake Tower → Bay Lake Tower at Disney's Contemporary Resort – While commonly referred to as Bay Lake Tower, the official name of this Disney Vacation Club resort is Bay Lake Tower at Disney's Contemporary Resort[1]. As such, to follow the naming convention of the other resorts listed in Category:Disney Vacation Club this page name should be moved to the official name (while still citing the "...commonly referred to as Bay Lake Tower," in the first paragraph). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.17.50.237 (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I fail to see the argument here. We use the common name, not the official name, and the proposer admits that the common name is Bay Lake Tower. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; "Bay Lake Tower" is precise enough to uniquely identify the subject, more concise, and perfectly recognizable to the reader. There's no need to move just to mesh with Disney's official paperwork. Powers ^T 12:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Common name. Marcus Qwertyus 00:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Bay Lake Tower logo

Logo

I found this - not sure if it's accurate(?). If it is, we may as well use it here.

Neo12345292 (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bay Lake Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On Bay Lake Tower Criticism

The criticism of the architecture does not seem to have any supporting evidence. There is only one source cited, and it completely rips the text from proper context. Here is the actual line from the article:

"The Art & Architecture Building and its “sadly conventional” design..."

Notice the "sadly conventional" is not referring to Bay Lake Tower at all. Indeed, it's talking about another building entirely. Furthermore, the article ends up being largely positive about the design. While it is not without its quibbles, the article even suggests Bay Lake Tower is superior to the original Contemporary building. The criticism section should either be augmented with supporting evidence or eliminated entirely until evidence is found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.136.45 (talk) 23:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]