Jump to content

Talk:Battlespace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Battle Space

[edit]

Battle Space has huge article potential as much as any other. It encompasses many theatres and should have it's own article. This is not a word definition, it is an article. List of marijuana slang terms 23:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well currently it really isn't anything other than a dictionary definition. I'm happy to give you some time to improve the article, but at some point if it doesn't turn into a true Wikipedia article then I or someone else will send it to AfD. Good luck, Gwernol 02:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Save your threats for someone who will actually be intimidated by them. Go ahead and post it for a vote, I will enjoy it ! List of marijuana slang terms 10:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not threatening you, just trying to advise you about the need to expand the article. I'm glad to see you've started doing this, and the article is getting a lot better. Best, Gwernol 12:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article's main shortcoming (as of October 2022) is its lack of context. It is written like doctrine, with no acknowledgment that the concept has a history or any cultural or political context. The fact is, there is no such thing as a battlespace except in the context of military training, analysis, or philosophizing. In other words, it is an abstraction. Its meaning is even more dependent on context than most things are. -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 16:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could easily argue that "Space" in the context of battlespace includes the concept of space-time (e.g. time in context of battles). Time is of significant essence in any battle. Intro needs a little work on definition if you agree. --2600:6C48:7006:200:5C10:C716:750B:C3B2 (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Context

[edit]

Where and when did this concept arise, and who subscribes to it? This article reads more like a US field manual than an encyclopedia article. —Michael Z. 2007-07-29 20:25 Z

Battlespace is NOT a unified military strategy. You only have to read the correct DoD/MoD definition, (which it appears somebody has bastardised) to understand that it is about situational awareness. Perhaps you should have all gone to staff college before bullshitting on military topics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.249.106 (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The term "Battlespace" has been rescined from US Army use, although the USMC retains the term. The term now being used is "Operational Environment." D Vance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.27.1.18 (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield

[edit]

IPB stands for Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield, based on the US Army Field Manual, Federation of American Scientists, and Mark Lowenthal's book Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy. I see a sprinkling of this IPB as "battlespace" idea on the Internet, but the major US sources say "battlefield". Is "battlespace" a British term? --Pat 05:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

See Draft talk:Battlefield where a discussion on possible mergers with this and battle are occurring -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battlespace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battlespace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battlespace&oldid=1206190389"