Talk:Battlefield medicine

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Logistics Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military logistics and medicine task force

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 September 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Neoaugustuscaesar, Tahaparvez, Tamw8, Arfeena.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can't

Can't source it, but I've heard 12% battlefield fragmentation wounds are head wounds (43% immediately fatal), 16% chest wounds (25% immediately fatal), 11% abdominal wounds (17% immediately fatal), & body armor reduces fatalities 10-20%. Also, of combat fatigue in WW2, Germany had 13 cases:100 wounded meny, against US 3:2. Trekphiler 20:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it would be nice to source it and create/expand WP coverage of battlefield armor mortality and morbidity reduction rates particularly on a cost analysis with a sensitivity matrix. Send to Congress, etc. GeoBard^Rap 21:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldnt war surgeon link to this page as well since it has no own page. At least until it has it own article.

"Meatball Surgery"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but from the way I've heard the term used, "meatball surgery" seems to imply a little more than just rapid stabilization; it also seems to connote an exchange of "aesthetics" and refined technique for speed, something along the lines of "It doesn't have to look pretty as long as it works and the patient survives." Am I incorrect in thinking this? intooblv (talk) 10:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battlefield medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battlefield medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140417170808/http://www.naemt.org/education/TCCC/guidelines_curriculum.aspx to http://www.naemt.org/education/TCCC/guidelines_curriculum.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ospreypublishing.com/content4.php/cid%3D219

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]