Talk:Battle of Zutphen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Zutphen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Battle of Zutphen has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 25, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 22, 2014, September 22, 2017, September 22, 2019, September 22, 2020, and September 22, 2022.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Dutch / European / Spanish / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	Spanish military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Zutphen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 15:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Interesting article. Review will proceed soon. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead & infobox

I question the need to wikilink war contributions, but, aside from this, the sections pass.

War contributions were an important way of financing the war effort in the modern age. I think it's worth leaving the link.

Background

"...thoug he managed to take Axel." Please fix typo

Done.

The rest passes.

Battle

"...defended by Count Herman van den Bergh with some men, but without success" Please as a period and fix the spelling error.

Done.

"...Albanian captain Nicolao Basta and Evangelista de las Cuevas..." These commanders are Albanian?

Basta was Albanian, Evangelista Spanish.

The rest, along with the aftermath section, of the section passes.

Conclusion

Very few issues with this article. Excellent work and congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Weymar Horren (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting needed

This article reads like it was not written by a native speaker of English. There are a number of spelling and grammatical errors.

York told Leicester that he knew well the kind of warfare practized by the Spanish
During the confussion...
Sidney allegedly had removed his cuisses when he saw that William Pelham did not wear their owns.
this, instead of Sidney's solidarity toward his companion, costed his life.

There are more, but I don't have time to find them. I don't see how this article was promoted to GA status. —howcheng {chat} 05:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]