Talk:Battle of Vertières

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Haiti Top‑importance

	Haiti portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Haiti, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Haiti-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HaitiWikipedia:WikiProject HaitiTemplate:WikiProject HaitiHaiti articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Haitian Rebels?

I wonder what is the idea of calling the Haitian Army led by Dessalines "The Haitian Rebels"? Is not the entire idea of being a Haitian also being a rebel of French colonialism? In that case it should be called simply, The Haitian Army. That is, of course, if you believe that by this time this army had developed a Haitian identity, even when they did not call themselves Haitians yet. Otherwise, you should still not call it "The Haitian Rebels" because you would be contradicting yourselves about that identity. So, at any rate, this title is incorrect. Please let me know your thoughts. If there is no response in two weeks I will take that as a sign of agreement. Thanks. Historian (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You raise an interesting and problematic point. While 'Haitian' would be empirically anachronistic, there is some sense in using the term rather than Saint-Dominguois, Bossales, Congos, or even Creoles. I see two related points: first is simply to stick with a convention that gets at the 'spirit' of the sense of collective (un)conscious. Scholars (Woodson; Trouillot) have convincingly argued that a cultural definition of liberté/égalité brought the disparate parties of the revolution in S.-D. together against French colonialism long enough for concerted political action and for the structuring of new social institutions. This suggests to me the 'seeds' of a Haitian national identity--even if one accepts the 'lapse into peasantry' that James Leyburn says occurred in the 1840s. Second, the fact that Dessalines and early administrators arrived at the name 'Haiti' suggests that the supposedly Arawak word 'Haiti' was not unknown to them. Perhaps it is not too much of a stretch to imagine that this word was already in use in some limited circles. For these reasons, I say stick with 'Haitian.' Lcyarrington (talk) 07:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Informal Tone?

The article as it is reads more like a fantasy war novel than a wikipedia page. 163.29.35.147 (talk) 00:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right it does. (lol) Savvyjack23 (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a cleanup tag. Thanks for pointng that out. Savvyjack23 (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and thanks for addressing the problem! 163.29.35.147 (talk) 02:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Vertières. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724230059/http://www.ahadonline.org/eLibrary/creoleconnection/Number16/greatmoment.htm to http://www.ahadonline.org/eLibrary/creoleconnection/Number16/greatmoment.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]