Talk:Battle of Tippecanoe/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
An important topic; review to follow shortly. Anaxial (talk) 11:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
The article is generally well-written and laid out properly, and seems to cover all of the important features of the battle. There are a few problems that I think need addressing, all of which should be able to fixed within one week:
- Some copyediting is needed in the first paragraph of the "Battle" section.
- The link to Prophetstown in the last paragraph of the "Battle" section points to a disambiguation page.
- The Curse of Tippecanoe is already mentioned and linked to in the text, and so does not need repeating in the "See Also" section.
- The direct quote from Harrison about Spencer's death should be more clearly sourced.
- Not a major problem, but the title "References" is generally preferred instead of "Sources", unless one is actually talking about source code or the sources of rivers, or whatever.
- The second External Link is broken.
- Thank you for your review! I Believe i have addressed each of the issues. Please let me know if there is anything more. Charles Edward (Talk) 19:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
That all looks fine to me. Well done!
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: