Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Tabu-dong/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Generally good prose. A couple instances of awkward speech, fixed those.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Battery of well formatted reliable sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Very excellent work here again.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Cropped one of the maps
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Well written article. Unequivocally passes GA criteria, but additional images, and improvement of prose would be required for FA. Also think expansion would be required.