Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Sarantaporo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 14:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take a look at this. Give me a couple of days. To be going on with, re images:

  • The map: "Source" means where did the information on the map come from, which was probably a book.
Good stuff. Thanks.
  • The lithograph: Needs a US PD tag. And "Source" in this case means where did you find the image which you self scanned? Again possibly a book.
  • The medal: I assume that you mean that you have an image of the medal, rather than the actual medal? If so, then see immediately above.

Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I have done a little copy editing which you will want to check. If you are unhappy with any of it, please flag it up here.

  • You start your list of divisions with "the 1st Infantry Division". Each of the other divisions needs 'the' in front of it.
 Done
  • "and the reserve (redif) Nasliç and Aydın Reserve Divisions" This seems a bit inconsistent. Are you sure that the Aydın Division had "Reserve" in its name? And that the Nasliç Division didn't?
Removed the extraneous Reserve.--Catlemur (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "locating the headquarters of the VIII Provisional Corps at Hania Viglas and those of a reserve division at Glikovo" Are these Ottoman or Greek units? If Ottoman, could you say so?
Those are Ottoman units whose positions were located by Greek patrols, I added Ottoman in front of the VIII Provisional Corps again.--Catlemur (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Having ceded Thessaly to Greece in the aftermath of the Convention of Constantinople" I thought that Thessaly was ceded by the Convention, and in the aftermath of the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878?
Replaced with "Having ceded Thessaly to Greece in the Convention of Constantinople (1881)".--Catlemur (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gog the Mild (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That all seems good. A little more copy editing from me for you to check that you are happy with.

  • A sentence or two at the end stating how the war ended would be useful?
I wrote a couple of sentences on how the war's conclusion.--Catlemur (talk) 16:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have tweaked the language a little. Could you check that you are happy with my changes?
  • Cite 7: a hyphen in the page range.
 Done
  • Katsikostas: the English translation of the title should be in title case.
 Done

I shall have another read through, but apart from this it seems good to me. A well put together article. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Nice article. Promoting. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:48, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed