Talk:Battle of Ormoc Bay

Military history: North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Scope of the battle

"The Battle of Ormoc Bay was a series of air-sea battles between Imperial Japan and the United States in Ormoc Bay in the Philippines between 11 November 1944 and 21 December 1944, "

Is such an extensive definition used by anyone other than Kappes, or should the name be applied just to the 77th Division's landing on 7 Dec, and the associated naval operations, in which Ward and Mahan (and a third ship?) were sunk?

Some people use "Battle of Ormoc Bay" for the November 11 air raid against TA-3 and TA-4 (see for example [1]). Others for the December 2–3 battle with TA-7 in which Cooper and Kuwa were sunk (see for example [2] and the US Navy's own [3]). The December 7 landings were another battle. In between there were other Japanese convoys, US destroyer forays and carrier and land-based air raids.

I think that Kappes has a strong point when he argues that the Japanese convoy operations and the US interdiction deserve a unified treatment. Gdr 00:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The designation first seems to have appeared in 1973 when the Battle of Ormoc Bay Association was founded. This was a reunion group of Navy WWII vets who served on ships that participated in operations in the Bay during November and December, 1944. However, it apparently was first used by aviators of Halsey's TF-38 to describe the actions of 11 November 1944.

The "scope" is entirely artificial. It completely ignores the savage battle fought between the USAAF 38th BG and TA-4 on the morning of November 10. The 38th had had its mission of the 9th cancelled and alerted, along with two heavy bomb groups and three fighter groups, for a possible attack on the 10th. It is not an accident that Kappes, a naval historian, establishes a date that excludes the USAAF part of the campaign. That wiki continues to perpetuate such artifices as this is embarrassing.--Reedmalloy (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Commander

The article describes the land-sea battle but the Japanese commander is listed as Tomoyuki Yamashita, the commander of the land forces defending the Philipines who merely requested the reinforcements. The operational command of the Japanese forces engaged was in the hands of the naval commanders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.218.168.202 (talk) 04:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Ormoc Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/w2/waller.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050321091202/http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c13/cooper.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c13/cooper.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]