Talk:Battle of Orašje

Battle of Orašje has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 22, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Balkan / European / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Bosnia and Herzegovina Mid‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Battle of Orašje is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Orašje/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 13:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The Background section needs greater chronological context, use of years with dates (ie 1992, 1993 etc) as it is currently hard to tell when some events happenedY You need to introduce the abbrev RSK before using itY I've c/e'd the article, feel free to revert any changes
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	I have a query about the JNA being reorganised into the VRS. That is not strictly true, as a large portion of the JNA withdrew to what is now Serbia. There is then a mention of JNA forces in BH, and whilst there might well have been large numbers of former JNA personnel and vehicles in the Bosnian Serb forces, were there JNA-badged elements inside Bosnia at this stage? Could you expand this bit to reflect the complexity?Y Reference to Serb artillery should probably be Bosnian Serb artilleryY
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	~~On hold for seven days for remaining points to be addressed~~ Passed

Suggestions

add alt text to maps
add photographs
you should probably redirect the operation names to this article

Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I have tried to address a couple of issues, specifically whose artillery exactly was it in April 1992 near Sarajevo, and bits about JNA personnel transfer to the VRS and JNA withdrawal. I've also introduced the RSK abbrev, and added years to dates in the background. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, happy with the changes, passing. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]