Talk:Battle of Ong Thanh/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Reasonably well written, I made a few minor copy-edits

Complies sufficiently with MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~References check out, RS, no OR. However the ELs are used as references so should be removed as per WP:EL~~ Done

I have replaced the online sources with book references as per Wiki reference rules, which I wasn't aware of.Canpark (talk) 07:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough and focussed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Licensed and captioned
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Just one minor point, the ELs. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]