Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Manila (1896)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

}}

Need to clarify the difference between this article and Battle of Pasong Tamo

[edit]

We need to clarify the difference between this article and the closely related Battle of Pasong Tamo article or merge the two. (And maybe with Battle of San Juan del Monte.) They might be separate events but that doesn't mean that they have to be separate articles, especially if they background and aftermath are the same and the events led from one to another. It might be better to have one large article talking about the various events, with sections for each event. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 04:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Manila (1896). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]