Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Málaga (1937)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are the numbers really correct?

[edit]

Hi, I am currently reading some books on the Civil War. It seems to me that the Numbers given in this article are not correct, but as I am no expert and do not have an account on the English Wikipedia, I did not want to edit it. Anyway: As an example, Hugh Thomas, 4th British edition, p. 567 gives the number of 12,000 Fighters on the Republican site. The article talks about 40,000. Apart from that the number of 40,000 seems unbelievably high to me... 74.115.160.21 (talk) 15:16, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Málaga (1937). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]