Talk:Battle of Langemarck (1917)

Germany Start‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source

I had some doubts about the Hamilton quotation so I looked here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources again. I think it should stand since it adds detail about the mud which every account mentions. Opinion?Keith-264 (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

/* British offensive preparations */ Cut duplicate material

The British drum fire began suddenly at 5.30 a.m., landing fifty metres to our rear. The attack in dense columns followed immediately. We fired our rifles at the rapid rate and threw grenades, once the British got close enough, causing them bloody casualties.... Suddenly we realised we were outflanked from the right, so we had to pull back again.... They forced their way into the pill box and took everyone prisoner, then they continued to advance.... British aircraft were flying down below fifty metres, shooting at our men with machine guns.... our artillery fired very successfully at the British.... We were freed by the counter-stroke and were very pleased to be back in German lines.^[1]

At 4.25 a.m. the attacking brigade advanced fast enough to evade the German barrage on the British front line and reached its objectives by 5.30 a.m., assisted by five Royal Field Artillery brigades. The German garrison of Westhoek was rushed, while on the right sniping and attacks by German aircraft caused considerable casualties. The division lost 158 killed, 1,033 wounded and more than 100 missing. The difficulties encountered by the 18th Division in Glencorse Wood on the right made consolidation difficult, due to the sniping and machine-gun fire. During the day and night of 10/11 August the Germans made several attempts to counter-attack but excellent artillery liaison by SOS signal, daylight lamps, pigeons and runners meant that the guns bombarded the German troops in their assembly poistions, preventing the counter-attacks except for one at 7.15 p.m. which was repulsed by rifle and machine-gun fire.^[2] The advance succeeded but German artillery fire and infantry counter-attacks isolated the infantry of 18th Division, which had captured Glencorse Wood and about 7.00 p.m. German infantry behind a smokescreen recaptured all but the north-west corner of the Wood; 25th Division's gains on Westhoek Ridge were held.^[3] By 14 August these divisions had been relieved by 56th and 8th divisions.^[4].Keith-264 (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Musketier Furst 8th Company RIR 90 in Pries, History of RIR 90 p. 222 in Sheldon, J. The German Army at Passchendaele, p. 111.
^ Kincaid-Smith, M. The 25th Division, pp. 87–93.
^ Edmonds, J. OH 1917 II, pp. 185–187.
^ Kincaid-Smith, M. The 25th Division, p. 93.

Items moved from main page

British casualties 31 July–28 August are given as 68,010 by the British Official Historian; 10,266 being killed, with a claim that 37 German divisions had been exhausted and withdrawn.^[1] On 20 August Sixt von Armin the German Fourth Army commander told the Kaiser that the battles on Flanders had cost his army 84,000 casualties.^[2]Keith-264 (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Edmonds, J. OH 1917 II p. 209.
^ Hagenlucke, H. The German High Command, p. 55 in Liddle, P. (ed) Passchendaele in Perspective, ch 4, pp. 45–58.

German defence

Added some material to flesh out the German side and to show the convergence of methods, equipment and prospects in late 1917.Keith-264 (talk) 13:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

French First Army

Found a narrative source for the French operations and expanded the section accordingly.Keith-264 (talk) 20:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think a reference has been misplaced:

"Further north in the XIX Corps area at 1:55 p.m., an attack by the 61st Division on a line from Schuler Farm to Gallipoli Farm failed and a 15th Division attack by a brigade on Gallipoli Farm also failed. In the XVIII Corps area, the 48th Division attacked with two brigades and three tanks towards Springfield and Vancouver Farms.[112]"

This is attributed to Munby's history of the 38th Division; Munby practically omits this battle and p.27 does not give greater context on what else happened.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DoneKeith-264 (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CE

Made converts consistently imperial-metric.Keith-264 (talk) 20:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Langemarck (1917). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719173700/http://www.ordersofbattle.darkscape.net/site/warpath/battles_ff/1917.htm to http://www.ordersofbattle.darkscape.net/site/warpath/battles_ff/1917.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cuts

I've cut the minor operations section now that they have articles and left a synopsis of the Cockcroft gig. Keith-264 (talk) 16:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Musketier Furst 8th Company RIR 90 in Pries, History of RIR 90 p. 222 in Sheldon, J. The German Army at Passchendaele, p. 111.

[2] Kincaid-Smith, M. The 25th Division, pp. 87–93.

[3] Edmonds, J. OH 1917 II, pp. 185–187.

[4] Kincaid-Smith, M. The 25th Division, p. 93.

[5] Edmonds, J. OH 1917 II p. 209.

[6] Hagenlucke, H. The German High Command, p. 55 in Liddle, P. (ed) Passchendaele in Perspective, ch 4, pp. 45–58.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]

[2]