Talk:Battle of Kyongju

Battle of Kyongju has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Kyongju article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / Korean / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Korea High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

United States High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Kyongju/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 20:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
- I dunno what's up with the flagicons and unit names in the Location field of the infobox, but they belong in the Units field.
  - Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- South Korea is either always ROK, Republic of Korea or South Korea; pick one. Same with North Korea/North Koreans. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 20:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've drawn a more clear connection between them to establish they are the same, but I've never heard anyone have a problem with the different terms; they refer to the same thing. —Ed!^(talk) 20:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Consistency, Ed.
      - Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Give ROK commanders, Aussie units and commanders.
  - ROK Commanders given, and Australian unit given but I can't find anything on the commander. —Ed!^(talk) 20:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Give breakdown of losses. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 17:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The exact numbers are impossible to determine, particularly for the North and South Korean troops, because records were so poor. —Ed!^(talk) 20:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I meant give numbers for missing, KIA and POWs. Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former
- Now the AUS and US units are on the same line, but that is easily fixed. Passed. Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former 19:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]