Talk:Battle of Kay/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox;
- Link "Count" in "Count Pyotr Saltykov" done
- Section 1;
- Link Berlin done
- Reword the complete last sentence as "Frederick tried to counter the Russian by sending an army corps, commanded by Friedrich August von Finck, and a second column commanded by Christoph II von Dohna", because the the King did not successfully counter the Russians, it was just an attempt done
- Link Poznan done
- frontier river Kwisa, or Queis -> frontier river Kwisa (German: Queis)
- From there Count Leopold Joseph von Daun; just link the name, not along with the title done
- north west toward -> north west towards toward is correct
- commanded by András Hadik -> commanded by Count András Hadik
- Section 2;
- Link Empress Elizabeth done
- but more realistic ones suggest; the word "realistic" is vague, you really don't know which figure is the real one. So better to reword deleting the word.done
- Russians at down the next day; I think it is to be "dawn" not "down" done
- Be consistent on using comma (,) after mentioning the date. In some case (On 20 July Saltykov had moved.....) and in some (On 23 July, Wedel ordered a reconnaissance....). Both are acceptable formats but consistency is the key. Fix a format for the article.
- Section 3; all good
- Section 4;
- In the second assault, Manteufel was injured; In the second para of the section 3; you said that he was injured in the initial attack, was he injured again? Did he not abandon after the first injury? make it clearer
- Can the position of General Moritz Franz Kasimir von Wobersnow be obtained? I mean what he commanded etc. I don't think so. I've not found it yet.
- In the lead; it is mentioned that Russian losses were less than 5,000, what about "Russian losses at over 7,000" Frederick said losses at 7,000.
- I suggest you to add the image of Pyotr Saltykov from his article done
- 0% confidence, violation unlikely, well done.
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: