This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms
The source refers to both battles. It says that there was a battle in 1469 on the same site as an earlier battle in 914, and that that earlier battle is known by this title. It doesn't give a reference to any primary or previous secondary source for that, but it was published in 1998 so at least doesn't get its information from Wikipedia. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The battle is not mentioned in histories of the period, it is not found on a search of Google Scholar and a Google search finds no reliable sources. Do you think the mention you have found is sufficient evidence to keep the article? Dudley Miles (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't, but I think it is enough to mean that this article should be discussed at WP:AFD rather than summarily deleted via WP:PROD with the rationale that you provided. If you make these points in a deletion discussion rather than here, and if nobody comes up with any more good sources, then this will probably be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]