Talk:Battle of Chamkaur

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

122.182.154.51 (talk) 12:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Gobind Singh Ji won the battle. Wazir khan all the army people died in this battle which that's why Guru Gobind Singh Ji won.

Not done Guru Gobind Singh Ji ran away - the rest of the Sikhs were killed - Arjayay (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some fact about chamkur

Few points reg Battle of Chamkaur:

(1) Merely 700 mughals soldiers not millions obviously.

(2) It was a mud house and not a qila (fort).

(3) No battle took place only siege.

(4) Siege lasted just a few hours because in the same night Guru Govind Singh escaped from the house.

.According to contemporary Mughal sources there were 700 Mughal soldiers at Siege of Chamkaur. And, it was a siege, never came to a field battle. After one day siege of the house in which Sikhs were besieged, Guru Govind Singh had to escape in night with a couple of followers.

Correct your knowledge false people false religion false history. 2404:3100:180B:E7D5:1:0:1E0C:1968 (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1,000,000

In the info-box it says Guru Gobind Singh metaphorically puts the opponents force at 1,000,000, but all the sources cited for it are just a translation of the text and make no mention of anything being metaphorical or literal or anything else. Does anyone have any more sources on this otherwise I will just remove it from the info-box. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace killed word with Martyr Also there was no victory of mughals as their target were Guru Gobind Singh ji And on The above please also mention the number of army Gurkirats533 (talk) 16:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Jassaltarun16 (talk) 20:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC) I am Punjabi historian specialized in Skh history and in this battle of chamkaur inlogical things are mentioned which are incomplete and lie as well. for example the result of the battle it was won by the guru gobind singh ji because the objective of the mughal army was to capture the guru gobind singh ji and present him infront of the mughal emperor Aurangzeb, which they were unsuccesful in. Secondly, many princely kingdoms names are missing who participated and allied on mughal side against sikhs. many other problems as well which needs to be fixed I will provide reference as well for my justification as well. It's very neccessary for our generation and upcoming generations to know the real history. Because Guru Gobind Singh Ji fought almost 14 wars in his lifetime and never lost a single battle.[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]