Talk:Battle of Chains

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request

I know that this article that i have writen is not unbiased and neutral. will some one help me to edit it to make it shorter ( comprehensive) and a bit more neutral. i will be very thank ful.

The article is in large parts copied word by word from the website mentioned at the foot of it. I'm not sure about the copyright. Other articles dealing with Khalid have probably the same problem. --84.63.63.158 14:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was tempted to place a {{fiction}} template on the article page, not because of a dispute with the facts but because of the style. As the above writer concedes it is not encyclopedic I will instead place a {{Copyvio}} template and direct respondees to this place. It may have to be heavily rewritten or even deleted, but I shall leave that to others more experienced. LessHeard vanU 21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now, as a matter of courtesy, commented on the original editors, and the Afghanistan Project, talkpage that this article has a {{Copyvio}} tag. LessHeard vanU 22:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Sword of Allah website, the content of the website can be freely distributed without permission:

http://www.swordofallah.com/html/faqshome.htm

"Can I copy information from this web-site to distribute elsewhere, whether through my web-site or my e-mail list?

You can copy information from this web-site and distribute it in any form, electronic or paper, without obtaining permission from us, subject to two conditions: (i) You do not change the content. (ii) You clearly state and link to, at the top of the section that the source of the information is www.swordofallah.com."

Jagged 85 01:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as that is okay with Wikipedias GDFL license then problem solved. Should the article note the source as required? LessHeard vanU 09:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article since it obviously can't be here on Wikipedia. One of the key points of Wikipedia is that anyone can edit other people's edits. Which is contrary to "You do not change the content." Garion96 (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned at the reference to 'The Battle of the Chains' - modern scholars are united in their opinion that this is a mistranslation of 'silsilah' or 'chained' formation. This description is also used of Byzantine and Persian cavalry units, and is a type of close formation not used by Arab mounted. The idea that cavalry units could be chained together is ludicrous. Doug Me (talk) 04:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The idea that infantry could be chained together is equally ludicrous. As soon as a few men were wounded or dead the line could not move any more, not even to attack. This is one of those 'topoi' (see Albrecht Noth) in ancient historiography, in order to show that one's own troops were braver than the opponent, who had to be tied together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:5045:1BC0:B012:FC8F:EE0F:3617 (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sallasil? Salasil is correct. Misnah ibn Haris? al-Muthanna ibn Haritha is correct. --Cloj (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Chains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041210000537/http://www.swordofallah.com/html/bookhome.htm to http://www.swordofallah.com/html/bookhome.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not stolen

The article this one was supposedly copied from, http://siraaijaz.blogspot.nl/2015/02/the-great-battle-if-chains-khalid-bin.html, was written in February of 2015. This article was written in July 2007, See https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chains&oldid=254374046 .

The images were not there when the article was made, But by the time that blogspot article was made, Those images already were in the article.

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chains&oldid=644452599 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koopinator (talk • contribs) 13:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]