Talk:Battle of Camp Hill

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

February 2010

I reverted this edit because it was not formatted properly and because it was a quote from a primary source. I had considered including something similar but I could not find a reliable secondary source that drew that conclusion from the wording of this primary source so I did not include it.

I found several books that quoted the passage (it is from "The third [listed in the article], dated 1 May 1643, is a strong Parliamentary production, possibly the most savage of all") and they are listed in the article see also for example Stuart England by Angus Stroud p. 105 that also includes the rape or as the source puts it "beastly assaulted many women's chastity and impudently made their brags afterwards how many they had ravished". But this is from a biased pamphlet and unless an historian says it happened or quotes it as happing then we can not use it. -- PBS (talk) 13:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Newman University

There used to be a number of sources published by Newman University

"Local History: Civil War". Newman University. 2013. Archived from the original on 13 August 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2015.

Some of them contained OCR errors and most of them of these sources are either in this article on or on Wikisource. -- PBS (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]